Marijuana Debate

Erica Del Vigna Coms 2 Negative sketch Proposition The state of calcium should legalize marijuana. I. Introduction Thesis though I agree that marijuana should be put into a controlled environment, I believe it should non be legalized due to its poor wellness propertys, and its damaging influence towards the young and medicine users. Preview I get out be explaining today why the affirmatives plan does will not work as a sufficient plan in California. I will sidetrack by refuting his claims that marijuana is not a doorway medicate. I will also explain the future harm that legalizing this drug could do to the youth of our state.Finally, I will connect the link on drug users to sorrys. overall this drug does not benefit our future generations socially or for their wellness. harmonize to Scripps Alcohol and Treatment Center in California, we convey yet to render a patient come through here who doesnt attrisolelye his colony to having started with marijuana as a admittance drug. II. dust A. Ills and significance refutation 1. The affirmative claims that marijuana is not a gateway drug, which is the farthest from the truth. Most people who are in a discourse center started off by occasionally using marijuana.As I verbalise in my previous quote from the Scripps alcohol center, most addicts blame their addiction habits to starting with a gateway drug like marijuana or alcohol. The clinician who was interviewed stated that society realizes the real dangers of marijuana as a gateway drug. Even though in 1996, medical marijuana was passed by California voters with Proposition 215 by a 56 % passing rate in 2010, Proposition 19 failed because California voters did not want to legalize marijuana, as stated in the Christian Science Monitor date may 2012. . The affirmative argues that law enforcement should spend their days fighting something more pregnant than drug users. I strongly disagree with this because of the evidence showing that drug users lead to harsher crimes. Allowing people to use drugs is telling the youth of California that it is authorize to smoke weed. This could potentially turn otherwise respectable children into drug using, criminal adults. In the article by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Legalization of marijuana Potential impact on youth in 2004, the doctors state that legalization of marijuana would have a negative effect on youth because in would decrease the adolescents perceptions of risk and increase their exposure to the drug. In affinity to a Dutch study from 1984 to 1992, decriminalization increases marijuana use by adolescents because making marijuana legal makes it available. American manufacturers of alcohol and tobacco grocery store their products to young people and marijuana would be the same.Marketing research shows that if lone(prenominal) 1% of 15-19 year old Americans began using marijuana, there would be approximately 190,000 parvenu users. B. Cure refutation 1. The affirmatives p lan will not work for multiple reasons. Although some may use the drug for health benefits, it will cause more problems to society than help. The Office of National dose Control Policy director, John Walters states that Marijuana damages the brain, heart, lungs, immune re primary(prenominal)s and contains cancer-causing compounds. It also impairs learning, memory, perception and judgment which are connected to car accidents and oeuvre accidents.It should not be legalized because it is too dangerous and causes severe health problems. In the article by Taxman and Thanner, Risk, Need, and Responsivity in Crime & Delinquency dated 2006, the authors agree that marijuana should not be legalized because 20% of the state drug offenders reported involvement with firearms and 24% of the state drug offenders had prior convictions for hazardous offenses.. Repeat offenders connected with weapons and violent offenses incur high costs but keeping these criminals off of the streets is worth it. C. Cost-Benefits There are 4 main disadvantages that could take place if we legalize marijuana 1. Drug users throughout the global population may rise. 2. Many more people will be using firearm and could demonstrate violent behavior 3. More health damage than good could affect millions of people either as users or from second hand smoke 4. Moral and ethical values could be put in jeopardy III. Conclusion 1. California currently only allows medical marijuana users to legally purchase marijuana. If we allow all citizens to have access to this drug, we could potentially lead California down a in truth bad path.We would see far more crimes and cases of drug addiction. We do not want the future leaders and adults to think that it is politically or socially correct to use this drug. 2. It is clear from previous California elections that Californias people do not want the law to be changed. In order to keep the state safe, and healthy, it is crucial that marijuana is not legalized for u npaid use. Works Cited 1. Joffe, Alain and W. Samuel Yancy. Legislation of Marijuana Potential Impact on Youth. American Academy of Pediatrics. 1136 (2004) 632-638. 2. Taxman, Faye and Meridith Thanner. Risk, Need and Responsivity. Crime & Delinquency. 5228 (2005) 28-51. 3. Weil, A. T. et. al. clinical and Psychological Effects of Marijuana in Man. Science Magazine. 1621234 (1968) 129-132. 4. Benson, John et. al. aesculapian Marijuana should marijuana be a medical option? approximation Link National Network. Retrieved from www. neighborhoodlink. com/article/Community/Medical_Marijuana. 5. Khatapoush, S. and D. Halifors. Sending the Wrong pith Did Medical Marijuana Legalization in California Change Attitudes some use of Marijuana? Journal of Drug Issues. 344 (2012) 751-770.