Comparing And Contrasting The Different Types Of Love Found In Plato's Essay

Comparing And Contrasting The contrasting Types Of Love Found In Platos Symposium And St. Augustines Confessions - Essay ExampleRegarding our main topic of focus, delight is neither an fleece nor a concrete emotion or feeling. In our daily lives, we usually and constantly refer to the intelligence agency experience innumerable times simply because of our unfamiliarity with its averageing. In all those instances whereby we apply the term love, we mean different things though unawares. In most cases, however, we mean that the referee is something or soulfulness that we desire and would profoundly prefer looking after or caring for. Everything can be a subject to amiable by another both abstract and concrete. However, concrete things objects that have no emotions cannot love. The love of an individual towards someone or something therefore encompasses an extremely broad nature and has to be succinctly espoused. The study outlined beneath encompasses both the similarities and al so the dissimilarities between the two philosophers in terms of what their views are regarding the critical issue of love (St Augustine 373). Plato derives his views and definitions for love from the evaluation of other peoples personal conveniences regarding love. This kind of love is referred to as common love, tho for sexual satisf operation. He defines heavenly love as a profound feeling or prideful emotion that e gentlemanates from the soul and characterized by a no-conditional liking and passion between mostly a man and a man. This kind of love is made possible by a connection to the heavenly God. This love is deeply root beyond the soul and is indispensable. Common love is referred to as immoral and vulgar since it is aimed at satisfying the participants sexually over a short period of time. This love comes from the profound and potently rooted physical attraction. This kind of love is not right and is not supported by the two philosophers. St. Augustine gives the like ki nd of types of love and expounds on the instances in almost a similar way as Plato (Sheffield et al 1). In both their assessments, they perceive the female gender as inferior to the men excluding the goddesses. This elicits a likeness between the two scholars views on the nature and types of love (St Augustine 373). twain Plato and Augustine come to terms that there is a greater version of love than the concrete and physically expressed love. This kind of love is enlightened and formless. Both men and women aim at receiving that enlightenment but in entirely diverse ways. Augustine slightly differs with Plato regarding the actions and activities inculcated in the love relationship. This is sexual contact between people who love each other. Plato argues that sexual intercourse is a path to achievement of the higher love that everyone aims to obtain and which brings about enlightenment. Augustine, on the other side argues that the action of sexual intercourse only brings about trade offs towards the achievement of such enlightenment to the higher reality. He perceives and strongly believes that expression of physical love is not a stepping stone but rather a prohibition to attainment of spirituality. This is due to the fact that he had previously experienced situations regarding the same issue at hand. He considered romantic or common love as purely sacrilegious and non credible since he had truly gone through in his early ages. Plato argues that in the initial stage of love, the amans