Social Media and Innovation Essay Example for Free

amicable Media and intro Essay ruleological analysisThe purpose of this literature come off is to explore recorded literature and license relating to cordial media and origin. The seek method for the review consisted of by surveying a total of 20 articles 15 journal and meeting-proceeding ferments, and five practitioner articles centered on the topic in distinguishable contexts. A selection of trusted data animal foots were accessed through MSU Libraries electronic Resources in the search to find articles, let in the ACM digital Library, the IEEE IET Electronic library, Proquest and Google. All of the analyse literature exists between the years of 2010 and 2012. Table 2 (p. 10) reflects the articles that were apply in this review, listing the author and title of the drub, the implication of the understand, and whatever limitations of the subscribe noted.Different combinations of keywords were holdd to extract literature related to the topic, for example br ear ly(a)ly media and base, hearty proceeds existence, and weave 2.0 and novelty, and many other configurations. The executive summaries and abstracts of the articles included were briefed to ensure relevancy, and later the articles themselves were reviewed in entirety. To make the occupation of reviewing the bulk of literature streamlined, and manageable key points were recorded for each article.The notes contain the main takeaways for the articles the authors purpose of the query or studies conducted, the main points, and claims most relevant to the general subject, the key findings, or results of the studies conducted, the ch eitherenges faced (regarding the specialized research/studies themselves, and those relating to the broader topic) and lastly, the recommendations offered, if any, including those applying to future research in the argona of the study, or those involving the companies and entities covered in the research. A table lay in all of this important informatio n give be provided for quick comparison of the different contexts that sociable media and launching were applied to.The research yielded a variety of perspectives regarding established literature and research in the area of mixer media and substructure, in addition to the real-world application of various accessible media and knowledgeableness models and evaluation of their performance. This literature review bequeath explore the perspectives, claims and findings of the articles included highlighting similarities and contrasts to discuss gaps and overlaps. Recommendations for future research in the area will be provided in the conclusion.IntroductionThe term brotherly media most commonly falls under the guise of the whatever of the most popular amicable networking websites to date, i.e. Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and Linked In. Truthfully, the phenomenon that is hearty media involves more than just photo sharing and billet updates. tender media networks are powerfu lnessful tools when usaged for familiarity creation and shared creativity. A more contemporary field of study, social media and base tends to branch off into other areas like clumpsourcing, and fall in conversion. These platforms enable realistic(prenominal) communities, or groups of people employ social technologies for collaboration efforts, of all kinds to execute t quests, solve problems, express ideas, and function in a group environment. To date, collaborative thinking has been proven to aid in the vicissitude operate. The exchange idea is that groups of drug maprs possess cluster-wisdom ( nightimes referred to as the wisdom of the crowd). It is a term describing the relative expertise or potential of familiarity on tap(predicate) from a crowd of people as opposed to restricted privileged experts. In, Rising Creativity and Participation in Innovation and acquaintance Management Activities, Gourova Toteva describe the effect that involving the crowd has had on harvesting development specifically in the business sector.The shift from vertical to a crosswise mathematical production model has brought changes in the innovation process, whereas end intentrs and external stakeholders provide additional benefits to organizations, which are increasingly using the wisdom of the crowd. (Gourova Toteva, 2011) With the evolution of the Internets landscape brought on by social networks and social technologies, comes the shift in methods of productivity. Crowd collaboration is at the heart of social media and innovation models, and according to the articles has began to provoke somewhat of a stir in organizations creative and development areas. Holtzblatt Tierney (2011) warn that iterating and developing ideas in closing off or with limited awareness of similar research in other parts of the organization spate correspond missed opportunities and duplication of effort. Collaborative innovation processes via social media networks stick pot ential to manifest rough-and-ready results when utilizing user-driven innovation activities. socially-enabling innovation processes mint tolerate positive effects on outcomes when participation is broadened, and greater conference around ideas is nurseed. (Holtzblatt Tierney, 2011) The article Six Key Takeaways on favorable Media and Innovation from Digital Marketing start Porter Gale, stressed the importance of the shift of one-way dialogue into real conversations, and urged theatres to get to know their transmit and customers, and to look beyond a numbers-only approach to measuring success. Results are not always return-on-investment returns may in any case be made by added fans/followers or with enhanced customer shacklement. (Arthur, 2012)Firms and organizations, realizing the advantageous properties of social media networks have began to use them, attempting to reap the benefits of them. Research and Development, product and software innovations, and familiar emplo yee dialogues to help garner virtual communities are just a few of the areas in which social technologies have been applied to help innovation. companionable media and innovation is an area in which the common practices and functions of social networks are manipulated, exposing the greater potential of productivity that they withhold, and so often, not credited for. The studies included in this review feature real-world applications of social media networks in business and in development, and theoretical evidence that the models merging social technologies and the innovation process have the potential to be productive. thick of LiteratureThe articles chosen for this review were extracted from the different databases mentioned previously. The literature explores social media and innovation from different perspectives, and how both the internal and external innovation process can be enhanced using social media. The variance of perspectives and focuses from different authors fostere d a host of different damage and models relating to social media and innovation. Below, table 2 illustrates the different keywords and key terms used in the literature, their definitions and the title and author of the work that contains those terms.Table (1) amicable Media + Innovation keywordsTerm commentary Author flexOpen innovation break innovation model A method for capturing judge form technology innovation- whether that innovation occurs within or outside the organization. Defining Open.(Gobble, 2012) Crowdsourcing The act of accessing the wise crowd for ideas and solutions (term coined by Jeff Howe). The variety Will be Shared Social Media and Innovation(Anonymous, 2011) Web 2.0 Technologies that enable users to communicate execute center and share it with each other via communities, social networks and virtual worlds. Social Media spend and Potential in Business-to- Business Companies Innovation.(Jussila et al, 2010 Social product innovation The practice of levera ging social media technologies in the innovation process. Kalypso Social Media and Product Innovation Research Findings.(Anonymous, 2011) Innovation-related collaboration Collaboration activities utilized in the innovation process.Social Media Use and Potential in Business-to-Business Companies Innovation. (Jussila, 2010) Communities of creation Groups of people who engage in generation of ideas for future products and services, actively discuss, come on elaborate and test them. Virtual Worlds as Collaborative Innovation and fellowship Platform.( chockful et al, 2012) User-driven innovation An approach in which users are the sources of ideas, drivers of the design, and decision makers throughout the design process. Practical Model for User-Driven Innovation in Agile software system Development.(Koskela et. al, 2011) Co-creation Describes the active map of users. Platform Model for User-Driven Innovation in Agile Software Development. (Koskela et. al, 2011) Customer Communities Communities of a companys end-users. Benefits of Social Media in Business-to-Business Customer Interface.(Jussila et al, 2011) User-driven innovation Describes users contributions to challenges launched by companies.Practical Model for User-Driven Innovation Agile Software Development.(Koskela, 2011) Lead user Active in idea development over an widen period of time. Getting Customers Ideas to Work for You Learning from Dell How to Succeed With Online User Innovation Communities(Gangi et al, 2010) Crowd futurology Refers to the forum of the future. Social media crowdsouced environment. opening 2.0 Describes social networking software to support and enhance the continuously changing and rising collaborative structures across enterprise Governing Web 2.0(Dedene et al, 2011) Wisdom of crowdsThe characteristic of crowds to create content, solve problems and even off do corporate research. Raising Creativity and Participation in Innovation and Knowledge Management Activities. (Gouro va Toteva, 2011) go-ahead social innovation Method that leave alones companies to take advantage of extensive networks, by providing open channels of communication and stimulating innovation. effort 2.0 and Semantic Technologies for Open Innovation Support(Carbone et al, 2010) User Innovation Communities Virtual partnership of interests of customers that get in with organizations in RD. The Next Digital Wave Using Social Media (Accenture, 2012)Social media and innovation begins with one excogitation social media technologies. Each article that was studied for this literature review, emphasized in one way or another, the revolutionary power that these technologies possess. Though different terms were used to describe the technologies, such as web 2.0, enterprise 2.0, and social technologies, the consensus between the authors is that they hold much potential (and often times untapped) to foster successful creative and productive environments.Real World Application/ ChallengesTh e literature reflects a variance in knowledge, and evidence available in the social media and innovation area, setly affecting the rate of adoption of companies and organizations. The articles studied for this review were create in the past two years. The general trend is that the older pieces (2010-2011) reflect a neglect of knowledge, resources, and statistics regarding social media and innovation. Jussila et al (2010) identified quaternity major challenges responsible absence of innovation processes using social media technologies in business to business companies leave out of understanding possibilities of social media in innovation, difficulties of assessing financial gains from social media, difficulties in adopting new mental models and practices needed for adoption, and neglect of evidence of similar using social media in innovation. (Jussila et al, 2010) The authors nominate one cause being a relatively scarce amount of information in the area, and abrupt theoretica l and empirical research. (Jussila et al, 2010) Similarly, Bettina Mikko (2010) agreed that the literature is relatively scarce concerning open innovation in the specific channel on online communities. (Bettina Mikko, 2010) Despite the lack of knowledge, they acknowledge efforts to incorporate these type of open collaboration activities.Although some firms have adopted these principles, the way for users to communicate their ideas to the firms remain underutilized with a few exceptions. (Bettina Mikko, 2010) A general lack of knowledge in the area of social media and innovation is not the only cited issue relating to real-world applications of models and policies. In the article, Social Media and Product Innovation Research Findings, (2011) a survey of more than 90 manufacturing and service companies revealed that 70 part of the participating companies are using or were planning to use social media for product innovation, but of those respondents, little than half had an implem entation and/or management strategy in place. Forty-six percent of respondents revealed a lack of knowledge regarding effective approaches. (Anonymous, 2011)The article notes one of the causes of this trend as the lack of knowledge among companies uncertainty of benefits (of social media innovation strategies) and leading practices. (Anonymous, 2011) Gangi et al (2010) acknowledges the potential of business models using social technologies to engage users as a competitive advantage, but also lists challenges companies face in implementation 1) understanding users ideas posted, 2) identifying the best ideas, 3) balancing inevitably for transparency against disclosure (protecting user-submitted ideas for competitors, 4) sustaining the confederacy (developing strategies for interacting with the community to sustain user participation. Koskela et al (2011) confirms the claim that companies do not have enough knowledge of utilizing users input and social media- found interaction in inn ovation and software activities, in the article Practical Model for User-Driven Innovation in Agile Software Development.A changing of perspectives occurs in the articles written between 2011-2012. Gourova Toteva (2011) argue that the rate of adoption of creative activities involving customers in the process is increasing in companies. The authors concluded the article Rising Creativity and Participation in Innovation and Knowledge Management Activities, by stating Nowadays social media is increasingly supporting innovation and is behind most open innovation processes and users co-creation activities. Following in line with this claim, Figge et al. (2012) reveals that most big corporations chose to tap into the ripening portion of participative consumers to refine their marketing strategy practices, and that social media, being major sales and marketing channels, have allowed for increasing collective trends in consumption. (Figge et al., 2012)Pena (2012) concluded after a study of multi-national corporations use of social innovation sites and application of content found on those sites that magic spell multi-national firms did not formally embrace social platforms for innovation, motionless or informal use of these sources were endorsed by 100% of the interviewees. (Pena, 2012) The two main barriers to use of the sources included 1) a lack of clarity around the owner of the finished idea and the potential for litigation and 2) the fact that argument becomes informed of firms intentions as they pursue innovation from social formats. (Pena, 2012)Business ContextsSeveral articles applied to or studied social media technologies and the innovation in the creation processes of firms. There were several articles analyzing and comparing the use of social media innovation processes, specifically business-to-business and business-to-consumer firms. The differences between the two in terms of categories of clientele and business practices reveal similarities and dif ferences in innovation and collaboration methods.In Social Media Use and Potential in Business-to-Business Companies Innovation, Jussila et al, makes the point that the use of social media in innovation processes can reveal great potential for success in b2b companies, like in b2c companies, and was used with innovation partners (outside audience) more often than with b2c companies. (Jussila et al, 2010)Jussila et. al (2011) acknowledged the assumption that it is much more difficult to utilize social media in business innovation and customer interface for business-to-business innovation and customer interface for business-to-business products, markets and product development. Research exploring social media and benefits from the business-to-business customer interface perspective found potential causes for variance of social media use in different phases of innovation processes patterns of interaction between firm and customers start with roles, knowledge creation activities vary d epending on nature of knowledge to be created and lastly, customers motivation to participate or be involved in innovation process activity rather than product support. Other articles focused on business in a broader context in order to make implications or recommendations in the field of study Fuller et al (2012) studied IBMs use of social media use in innovation and collaboration processes using virtual worlds (second life) in the article Virtual Worlds as Collaborative Innovation and Knowledge Platform.During the course of the study, IBM equanimous experience by using 3D environments as communication and interaction platform within the organization. The study findings indicated potential for virtual worlds to foster creative ideas both within, and beyond the company. (Fuller et al, 2012) Similarly, Gangi et al (2010) analyzed and assessed challenges present in the first 18 months of Dells IdeaStorm program implementation and offered recommendations for successful management of o nline user innovation communities. The recommendations are relevant to any application of a user-driven innovation platform create a user toolkit, strategically position key personnel to ensure clear, logical flow of ideas to proper internal resources, engage the lead users of the platform, promote self-governance in users to enable community to carry more of workload, respond quickly and ask questions, make user-submitted votes count and present progress clearly and openly to the community. (Gangi, et al, 2010)Software DevelopmentThe use of social media for innovation purposes is applied to the development of software in both internal and external (employees of organizations vs. user activities) contexts. In Using Web 2.0 to Improve Software Quality. Black Jacobs (2010) assert that the development process has been altered collect to social media, now including interaction design where feedback from users is further, and used as part of the ongoing development process. The study examined social media use in collaborative group work using distant teams. Organizations are encouraged to focus implementing social technologies for purposes of group work. The use of social media presents an opportunity for an organization to build a distributed knowledge base and increase employees sense of connection to companies initiatives and to each other. (Black Jacobs, 2010)Koskela et, al (2011) claims that online co-creation among users and developers needs continuous facilitation thus allowing direct user interaction to enhance the perspectives of each group and placing more importance on the uses goals. According to Practical Model for User-Driven Innovation in Agile Software Development, by implementing user-driven innovation incorporate users, even in a quick, agile software development process is not only feasible and can be potentially beneficial to the organization. (Koskela et. al, 2011)Technological ApplicationsInnovation and social media have technological im plications, specially in the areas of enterprise 2.0 and open-innovation processes. Structuring Web 2.0 collaborative platforms and strategies is discussed in two of the articles used for this review. In the article Enterprise 2.0 and Semantic Technologies for Open Innovation Support, Carbone et al (2010) emphasizes the potential of enterprise 2.0 technologies by asserting that they have the power to usher in a new era by make both the practices of knowledge work and its output more visible. The article proposes a new model Semantic web to transform human-readable content into machine-readable content. This new model controls and structures the heavy flow of user-submitted information, an aspect brought on by the collaborative paradigm. (Carbone et al, 2010)Dedene et al (2011) proposes four grounding principles to help organizations get the most out of their Enterprise 2.0 investments. In the many-to-many, decentralized environment present in Web 2.0 collaborative activities, stru cturation is emphasized as a key process and is made doable by these four principles 1) empowerment principle- empowers users to discover desirable uses of technology rather than draw up barriers to unsuitable use, 2) processes principle- enables process workers and managers to capture value from experimenting and progressively synthesizing new ways for processing, 3) collaboration principle- lets virtual communities and teamwork emerge from a free-flow of collaboration engagements, rather than pre-assign bulk of roles, activities and access rules and finally 4) people and culture principle- invites people to participate, rather than coercing them to work in a particular way. (Dedene et al, 2011)Findings/ PitfallsAll of the articles studied for this review acknowledged the potential of the use of social media for purposes of innovation to be successful avenues reaching end consumers and sparking creative thinking within a firm or organization. The articles, both theoretically focu sed, and case studies of real-world application conveyed the benefits of implementation and recognized the area as revolutionary, and the needful direction of the innovation process for firms and organizations. It goes without saying, that there is another side to the coin when it comes to model and strategy implementation. Gangi et. al (2010) identified one potentially damaging characteristic of social media that could negatively effect innovation efforts.The viral aspect of all web 2.0 technologies means that an org could quickly lose control of negative content. (Gangi, et al, 2010) The pervasiveness and instantaneous aspects of social media can be damning to an organization based on self-published material, or user-published. (Carbone et al, 2010) Managing the overwhelming amounts of information that exists, as an end-result of the decentralization of ideas may be difficult to achieve. Ideas contributed via social media networks present an issue with idea ownership receivable to blurred line between what is idea adoption and what could be conceived as theft of intellectual property. As mentioned by Pena (2012) this is one cause of avoidance regarding companies implementation of social technology strategies.RecommendationsDedene et al (2011) notes that managing the technologies for effective use requires strategy and knowledge, and that organizations have not fully mastered these concepts. The promise of Enterprise 2.0 is enticing to many orgs but experience and research into managing such investments to effective benefits realization has not yet reached full maturity making people mindful about the capabilities of the technology is an absolute precondition to benefits generation from the technology. (Dedene et al, 2011) The lack of knowledge available in the application of social media for innovation purposes, though lessening over time, is still a practicable issue of concern for companies attempting to implement models. It is important for there to b e an accessible collection of literature to foster field knowledge, and to increase in real-world applications. The lack of understanding due to little to no knowledge base has attributed to the skepticism among businesses and IT professionals. (Dedene et. al, 2011) More research should be executed in this area and more literature developed. Organizations will not invest in ideas that are not fully understood.The reach of evidence of benefits of the use of social media for purposes of innovation needs to be increase. Not only should literature about implementation be increased and shared, but also firmer guidelines for successful use of social media for innovation should as well. Many of the major and minuscule firms and organizations venturing into this somewhat unchartered territory are doing so without a definitive strategy. A set of published principles, assisting first-time implementation, corrective implementation, and for use throughout operation, (management of platforms) s hould become accessible. This set of principles would provide some protection against simple mistakes and allow for smoother, more streamlined implementation for firms and organizations.Table (2)Table of LiteratureAuthor/ Work Implication/ Findings Limitation(s)/ Pitfalls Benefits of Social Media in B2B Customer Interface in Innovation(Jussila, et. al, 2011) Social media can be useful in all stages of B2B companies innovation processes. Companies dont understand how to be active with social media effectively. Measuring the Effectiveness of Social Media on an Innovation Process(Holtzblatt Tierney, 2011) Using social media, it is possible to accelerate the transition of new technology and knowledge to customers by expanding staff and end-users direct communications. Limitations of data restricted to interactions that occur on-line inside the IdeaMarket (platform used in research). Is Open Innovation Open?(Bettina Mikko, 2010) Social media and open innovation principles remain under utilized by companies. Most innovational firms that were studied were multinational with multiple websites, all using different content. Platform Model for User-Driven Innovation in Agile Software Development(Koskela et al, 2011)The model using co-creation tools and direct user-interaction can be applied to the innovation processes of other consumer-targeted products and services.. Companies do not have enough knowledge of utilizing users input and social media based interaction in innovation and software activities. Raising Creativity and Participation in Innovation and Knowledge Management Activities(Gourova Toteva, 2011) Nowadays social media is increasingly supporting innovation and is behind most open innovation processes and users co-creation activities. N/a Social Media and Product Innovation(Anonymous, 2011) When it comes to applying social technologies to product developments and innovation, most organizations are still in the early adoption phase. N/a Social Media Use and Potential in B2B Companies Innovation(Jussila et al, 2010) Both B2B and B2C companies were taking advantage of social media use in innovation processes The gap of perceived use between two different business types is significant. Research should be carried out to facilitate adoptions and fill gap. The Revolution Will Be Shared Social Media and Innovation(Anonymous, 2011) Social technologies used for innovation purposes are revolutionary N/a Using Web 2.0 to cleanse Software Quality(Black Jacobs) Social media among other benefits, has changed the development process to include interaction design, where feedback from users is used. N/a Virtual Worlds as Collaborative Innovation and Knowledge Platforms(Fuller, et. al, 2012) Virtual worlds can offer new ways of having access to knowledge and creative ideas within and beyond companies. Virtual community lacked total security and some complained about poor graphics Getting Customers Ideas to Work for You Learning from Dell How to Succeed With Online User Innovation Communities.(Gangi et al, 2010) A poorly managed user innovation community could have devastating consequences for an organization. Challenges for companies included Understanding users ideas posted, Identifying the best ideas,Balancing needs for transparency against disclosure (protecting user-submitted ideas from competitors) and Sustaining the community (developing strategies for interacting with the community to sustain user participation. Governing Web 2.0(Dedene, 2011) Enterprises can use principles and lessons to avoid the fallacy of going into social media for innovation endeavor with too much of a command/control view on tech adoption Many organizations have not effectively mastered management of social media and innovation platforms canvass the Increasing Role of Public Social Networks Within the Innovation Process of Large, Multi-National Corporations(Pena, 2012) Use of strong social networking within an organization propels innovation Firms did not embrace platforms, but all endorsed informal use.Two main barriers to use of sources by companies lack of clarity around owner of ideas, 2) competition may become informed of intentions Enterprise 2.0 and Semantic Technologies for Open Innovation Support(Carbone et al, 2010)The web 2.0 environment helped in establishing an innovation culture in the firms, while the sematic technologies helped not just in fostering interaction for the creation of new ideas, but also in supporting the decision process. N/a Defining Open(Gobble, 2012) Open innovation is among the new resources available for conceptualizing, creating and managing open innovations efforts at every scale. N/a Six Key Takeaways On Social Media And Innovation From Digital Marketing Pioneer Porter Gale(Arthur, 2012) One-way dialogue has evolved into 24/7 real-time conversations. N/a Social Media for Innovation Efforts (Lindegaard, 2013)The use of social media for innovation efforts is still new and full of opp ortunity. N/a Social Product Innovation2013 Kalypso Social media technologies are rapidly changing the way we communicate and collaborate. A extensive and sustainable strategy must be developed to deliver results. N/a Five emerge Innovation and Social Media Trends and Why They Matter Now(Ben-Yehuda, 2012) Social media and a renewed emphasis on innovation and DIY is transforming how government agencies operate and how they interact with citizens. N/a The Next Digital Wave Enterprise Social Innovation. 2012 Accenture Through enterprise social innovation, companies can benefit from a greater pool of ideas, ones that are line up more closely with the wants and needs of end-consumers. N/aWorks CitedJussila, J., Karkkainen, H., Meino, M. (2011). Benefits of social media in business-to-business customer inerface in innovation. 2011vACM,Holtzblatt, J., Tierney, M. L. (2011). Measuring the effectiveness of social media on an innovation process. 2011 ACM,Bettina, M., Mikko, L. (2010, Se p). Is innovation open? evidence from the most advanced(a) firms and the most valuable brands. European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, United kingdom.Koskela, K., Nakki, P., Pikkarainen, M. (2011). 17th international conference of concurrent enterprising, Finland.Gourova, E., Toteva, K. (2011). Raising creativity and participation in innovation and knowledge managment activities. 17th internation conference on concurrent enterprising.Anonymous. (2011). Social media and product innvoation research findings. Professional services close-up,Jussila, J., Karkkainen, H., Vaisanen, J. (2010). Social media use and potential in business-to-business companies innovation. 2010 ACM,Anonymous. (201). The revolution will be shared social media and innovation. Research technology management, 54(1), 64-66.Black, S., Jacobs, J. (2010). Using web 2.0 to improve software quality. 2010 ACM,Fuller, J., Hautz, J., Hutter, K., Matzler, K., Muller, J. (2012). Virtual worlds as collabo rative innovation and knowledge platform. 2012 IEEE,Gangi, P., Hooker, R., Wasko, M. (2010). Getting customers ideas to work for you learning from dingle how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS quarterly executive, 9(4),Dedene, A. G., Hertogh, S., Viaene, S. (2011). Governing web 2.0. Communications of the acm, 54(3),Pena, V. (2012). Investigating the increasing role of public social networkd within the innovation process of large, multi-national corporations. Business studies journal, 3,Carbone, F., Contreras, J., Hernandez, J. (2010). Enterprise 2.0 and semantic technologies for open innovation support. IEA/AIE 2010, part II, 18-27.Gobble, M. (2012). Defining open. Research technology management, Arthur , L. (2012, 3 6). Six key takeaways on social media and innovation from digital marketing pioneer porter gale. Retrieved from http//www.forbes.com/sites/lisaarthur/2012/03/06/six-key-take-aways-on-social-media-and-innovation-from-porter-gale-former-virgin-am erica-marketing-vp/Lindegaard, S. (2013, 01 31). Free webinar social media for innovation efforts. Retrieved from http//www.15inno.com/2013/01/31/smwebinar/Kalypso. (2013). Social product innovation, capabilites, kalypso. Retrieved from http//kalypso.com/capabilities/services/social-product-innovation/Ben-Yehuda, G. (2012, 11 1). Five emerging innovation and social media trends and why they matter now. Retrieved from http//www.govexec.com/excellence/promising-practices/2012/11/five-emerging-innovation-and-social-media-trends-and-why-they-matter-now/59179/Accenture. (2012). The net digital wave enterprise social innovation. Retrieved from http//www.accenture.com/us-en/Pages/insight-next-digital-wave-social-media-harness-innovation-summary.aspx