.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Evolution Of Management Essay -- Organization Management Industry

Evolution of Management In this publisher I will be explaining the evolution of management from the beginning of the industrial revolution to resign which includes Classical School of Management, the Human Relations/ behavioural School of Management, Theory X and Y, the Scientific Approach, Contingency Approach, and Theory Z. I will also be comparing the classical style and the present style to each other and to my current work environment. The Classical schooldays of thought began during the Industrial Revolution around 1900 and continued into th e 1920s when in the buff problems related to the factory system began to appear. Managers were unsure of how to train employees (many of them non-English speaking immigrants) or deal with increased labor dissatisfaction, so they began to test solutions. Traditional or classical management focuses on efficiency and includes scientific, bureaucratic and administrative management. bureaucratic management shoots a rational set of structuring guidelines, such as rules and procedures, hierarchy, and a clear division of labor. Scientific management focuses on the unrivalled best way to do the job. Administrative management emphasizes the flow of tuition in the operation of the organization. The first... ...g. Fayol believed that all managers performed these functions and that the functions distinguished management as a separate discipline of study apart from accounting, finance, and production.(Online - http//www .referenceforbusiness.com/management/Log-Mar/ManagementThought.html)3 McGregor recognized that some people may not have reached the level of maturity assumed by Theory Y and therefore may need tighter controls that can be relaxed as the employee develops.(Online - http//www.envisionsoftware.com/articles/Theory_X.html)4 This approach arose out of the observation that the leash earlier approaches to management - the Classical, the Behavioral, and the Operations Research - did not always prevail to an acceptable solution(Patrick J. Montana and Bruce H Charnov, Management, Third Edition, page 30)

No comments:

Post a Comment